1. Review: What is the author trying to convey, and what are the primary and secondary
points that are made as it relates to computer crime in general, or a specific aspect of
computer crime? How does this fit in against the backdrop of all that we are learning in this
2. Analysis: What do you (personally and critically) think about the reading? Based on your
knowledge or personal and professional experiences, do you think all of what is said is
valid? Is some of it? Is none of it? Why? What are some strong or weak aspects of what
is said, and why? What are the major limitations, and are they correctable? If so, how?
3. Application: How might the main points of the reading be applicable in real life – given
the fact that we cannot fully control human behavior? How can the ideas be used to
address, prevent, or reduce computer crime in all areas of society? Are there specific role
players who can help with the implementation of the ideas/strategies more than others?
Students are expected to respond to each of these questions using at least 500 words for each summary of weekly readings, citing examples in the readings (or other scholarly sources) using APA format where relevant. You can write more than 500 words in each of your summaries many students need to do so to cover all that
they want to cover. It is important that each summary is clear, concise, thoughtful, and original. Dont restate what you find online think for yourself and have your own opinions.
OK, IN MY OWN WORDS. YOU HAVE TO READ WEEK 3 (ALL THREE ARTICLES) THEN ANSWER THE TO 3 QUESTIONS WITHING 500 WORDS. THEN DO THE SAME FOR WEEK 4. DONT BE AFRAID TO GO OVER 500 WORDS SINCE I PAID FOR 1100.