Discuss the evidence-base underpinning skills for safe and effective inter- professional practice in the case of your individual patient / client / service user.

A PATIENT SAFETY CASE STUDY

I have attached my draft of work up to now which I think you will find helpful, I have attached the criteria and top tips. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any assistance.

Assessment format and structure:
For your assessment you are required to undertake a case study relating to patient safety.
From your practice experience to date, choose a patient/ client/ service user where there were actual and/or potential risks to their safety and more than one professional involved in the care.

Performance Criteria and Weighting
In relation to your chosen individual:
Marking Criteria % weighting
Explore the importance of risk assessment in the development and delivery of high quality, safe care in the case of your individual patient / client / service user
30%

Discuss the evidence-base underpinning skills for safe and effective inter- professional practice in the case of your individual patient / client / service user. 50%

Evaluate the contribution of your own profession within the-inter professional team in the case of your individual patient / client / service user. 20%

100%

Overall Marking Criteria Level 5
0-29 No evidence of ability to identify and debate underpinning principles and concepts relating to assignment task. Makes no attempt to relate theory and practice or to develop a logical argument. No evidence of relevant reading. Numerous referencing errors. Little care evident in relation to structure, use of language, grammar, and spelling. Poor presentation prevents reader understanding. Errors and omissions sufficient to constitute unsafe practice.
30-39 Minimal evidence of ability to identify and debate underpinning principles and concepts relating to assignment task. Minimal attempt to relate theory and practice and develop a logical and informed argument. Minimal evidence of relevant reading. Numerous referencing errors. Poor structure, use of language, grammar, and spelling poor. Errors/presentation affects meaning of work. Errors and omissions sufficient to constitute unsafe practice.
40-49 Adequate ability to identify and debate underpinning principles and concepts relating to assignment task. More description than analysis. Adequate approach to relating theory and practice. Some ability to judge and use appropriate evidence sources. Adequate use of resources. Some referencing errors. Basic structure evident but may be weak. Use of language not always fluent. Meaning apparent although, grammatical and spelling errors. Limited but safe practice.
50-59 Sound ability to identify and debate underpinning principles and concepts relating to assignment task. A reasonable proportion of analysis evident. Sound approach to relating theory and practice and judging appropriateness of evidence sources. Sound use of resources. Few referencing errors. Structure and flow of work appropriate and easy to understand. Grammatical and spelling errors but do not affect meaning of the work. Safe and appropriate practice.
60-69 Comprehensive ability to identify and debate underpinning principles and concepts relating to assignment task. High standard of analysis evident. Comprehensive approach to relating theory and practice. Systematically judges appropriateness of a range of evidence sources using to inform decision making. Comprehensive use of resources. Very occasional referencing errors. Clearly and appropriately structured with most ideas clearly expressed, minor grammatical and spelling errors. Demonstrates a comprehensive approach to practice
70-79 Excellent ability to identify and debate underpinning principles and concepts relating to assignment task. Excellent ability to analyse and critique. Excellent approach to relating theory and practice. Systematically judges appropriateness of evidence sources, and uses to inform decision making, across a range of issues. Excellent use of resources. No referencing errors. Well structured, clear development of ideas. Majority of work is expressed clearly no grammatical and spelling errors. Excellent approach to practice.
80-100 Demonstrates an analytical and critical approach to the assessment task, based on an enhanced ability to manipulate underpinning principles and concepts. Outstanding and rigorous approach to relating theory and practice, enabling engagement with theory/practice debates that inform decision making. Outstanding use of academic style. Extensive selection and use of resources. Highly appropriate referencing throughout. Well focused and structured approach no referencing or spelling errors. Outstanding approach to practice.