Describe the real-world scenario in detail

CLASS TEXTBOOK- COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INFANCY THROUGH ADOLESCENCE: 2ND EDITION
KATHLEEN M. GALOTTI

You will write a 3- to 4- page paper that demonstrates your understanding of course concepts and your ability to apply them to the real world scenarios. In those pages, you must:

o Describe the real-world scenario in detail

o Define in your own words at least two specific course concepts (from lecture, the textbook, or other assigned reading/resources) and explicitly connect them to the real-world scenario.
IN THIS CASE-MEMORY, SHORT TERM MEMORY, LONG TERM MEMORY, EPISODIC, SEMANTIC, IMPLICIT, EXPLICIT, CENTRAL EXECUTIVE, EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONING, ATTENTION SPAN, WHY WE FORGET? 1. ENCODING FAILURE 2. STORAGE DECAY 3. RETRIEVAL FAILURE.
(THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES)

o Relate your ideas to at least one peer-reviewed empirical journal article that youve found in the library or online (i.e., through PsycINFO), summarizing the studies in enough detail to allow a nave reader to understand what the authors did and what they found.

***- Analyze a movie that illustrates course concepts (FINDING DORY) Describe how the movie depicts the course concepts accurately and, if relevant, how it deviates from what weve learned (i.e., is fictional/not based on science). ***

***NO MORE THAN ONE DIRECT QUOTE IS USED***

Application paper rubric

Thorough description of real-world scenario (6 points)

Appropriate choice of topic (e.g., has relevance to cognitive development; 3 points)

Thorough description of applied element that is understandable to a nave reader (3 points)

Application of two course concepts to real-world scenario (6 points)

Accurate definition of course concept in your own words #1 (1 point)

Thorough discussion of the connection between course concept # 1 and the real-world scenario (2 points)

Accurate definition of course concept in your own words #2 (1 point)

Thorough discussion of the connection between course concept # 2 and the real-world scenario (2 points)

Summary of peer-reviewed empirical journal article and connection to real-world scenario (6)

Appropriate choice of article (fulfills both criteria and has relevance to your topic; 2 points)

Description of study/studies that is understandable to a nave reader (2 points)

Thorough discussion of how findings connect to your other ideas in the paper (2 points)